Description

Reflections:  Being a founder is hard - building in public is even harder. Charts bring our really strong emotions in people, and I dont blame them - you are rooting for gitlawb to succeed and you are also emotionally invested, so setbacks are hard for the community as well.  A few things I know havent changed: I am 200% committed to the success of gitlawb and the vision of decentralized git layer  I will continue to build and experiment in public - some of those experiments will not work, some will be in the wrong direction, but I will fix things just as fast as I build.  I am always listening to the feedback of the community and of the market. On the last point - this is one of the most unique advantages of the fair launch model: I am building in public and the market reacts instantly. That instant feedback is rewarding, it can be harsh, but most importantly it’s the best way to build in this market where speed of iteration is a moat.  A few questions I am asking myself (and would appreciate more feedback) Was the market upset about the test token, or does it not like the model of tokenizing vibe coded apps?  Giving southeast asia a free/cheap app generation engine is valuable to me and the users, but how can I make it valuable to the business as well (beyond the benefits of virality and distribution)? How can I make the cheap app generation sustainable long-term beyond grants from large partners? What is the best way to tie in playground with the tokenomics the decentralized git infra? There is so much to build, should expanding the git infra (nodes, proof-of-stake for decentralization, gtm there) be prioritized?  I appreciate everyone’s feedback and looking forward to navigating through these questions together.  We build on!